Study Confirms Lenvima’s Benefits in Thyroid Cancer

Fact checked by Kristie L. Kahl
News
Article

First-time treatment with Lenvima continues to outperform other treatments for thyroid cancer.

Initial treatment with Lenvima (lenvatinib) continued to demonstrate higher success rates in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RAI-R DTC; no longer responding to treatment with radioiodine), according to real-world clinical data gathered from Europe and Canada presented at 2024 ESMO Congress.

“We have included patients from different practice types, including community [17.6%] and academic [75.8%] settings, as well as different countries and regions, representing a highly heterogeneous population,” Dr. Laura Deborah Locati, said in a presentation of the data. Locati is associate professor in the Department of Medical Oncology at the University of Pavia and director of the Translational Oncology Unit at Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Maugeri in Milan, Italy.

Study Highlights:

  • Initial treatment with Lenvima continues to outperform other treatments for thyroid cancer, specifically radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer.
  • The study relied on real-world clinical data from Europe and Canada, providing a more representative picture of Lenvima's effectiveness in a diverse patient population.
  • Patients treated with Lenvima experienced high progression-free survival rates at 12, 24 and 36 months, indicating that the disease was less likely to progress.
  • A significant number of patients achieved complete or partial responses to Lenvima treatment, demonstrating its effectiveness in controlling the disease.

Results and Methodology

In this study, real-world progression-free survival (PFS; the length of time during and after treatment when a patient with cancer lives with the disease without worsening) was measured from the beginning of Lenvima treatment until either the disease progressed or death occurred. If a patient experienced progression, PFS was not shown at the start of their next treatment or at the date of their last recorded activity. This applied to real-world overall survival (OS; the time from the start of treatment when a patient with cancer is still alive) rates as well.

The estimated PFS rates were 78.7% at 12 months, 61.5% at 24 months and 53.4% at 36 months. At 12 months the estimated OS rates were 92.2%, 83.1% at 24 months and 77.1% at 36 months. The median follow-up period was 17.9 months. At the end of the follow-up period, 79.8% patients were alive, 18.4% were deceased and 1.8% were reported as unknown.

Researchers established that 21.1% of patients experienced a complete response (the disappearance of all signs of cancer from treatment) and 53.7% had a partial response (a decrease in tumor size or extent of the disease in the body from treatment), resulting in an overall response rate (the percentage of patients with either a partial or complete response to treatment) of 74.8%. The estimated PFS rates at 24 months for those experiencing complete response was 95.5% and 57.3% had partial response. At 24 months the estimated OS rate was not reached for those who experienced complete response and 84.4% for those with partial response. Of note, when OS is not reached in a study, it means that at least half of patients were still alive at the time the data were analyzed. In addition, 21.4% of patients had stable disease (neither grows nor shrinks), 3.3% experienced disease progression and 0.6% were not recorded.

The median duration of treatment was 16.8 months and the median follow-up period was 17.9 months. Lenvima was administered once daily at a starting dose of 24 mg for 60.2% of patients, 20 mg for 24%, 18 mg for 12.2% and 14 mg for 3.6%.

“The main goal of this data collection was to assess the clinical effectiveness [of Lenvima] in real-world data from the patient population of radioiodine-refractory cases from different European countries, the UK and Canada,” Locati said.

SELECT Trial Results

In the phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multicenter SELECT trial, median PFS was longer in the Lenvima group at 18.3 months versus 3.6 months in the placebo group.

The response rate was 64.8% in the Lenvima group (including four complete and 165 partial responses) versus 1.5% in the placebo group. The median OS was not reached in either group.

Common treatment-related adverse effects in the Lenvima group included high blood pressure (67.8%), diarrhea (59.4%) and fatigue (59%). Lenvima led to discontinuation in 14.2% of patients versus 2.3% in the placebo group and six out of 20 deaths in the Lenvima group during the treatment period were drug related.

Patient Demographics

The retrospective patient chart review included 337 patients with RAI-R DTC who started first-line (initial treatment) Lenvima monotherapy on March 26, 2015, in Europe, or August 9, 2016, in Canada, until January 31, 2022. Lenvima was approved in Europe in 2015 and in Canada in 2016.

Regarding patient disease characteristics, 60.2% of patients had stage 3 or 4 disease with the following thyroid cancer types: follicular (51%), papillary (45.7%) and Hurthle cell (3.3%). In total, 98.8% of patients reported with metastases (the spreading of cancer) in various locations: 50.4% in the lymph nodes, 48.1% in the lung, 47.5% in the bone and 21.2% in the liver.

The majority (67.1%) of patients had an ECOG performance status score of 0 (meaning completing daily tasks entirely independently) or 1 (patients were able to complete most daily tasks independently) and 21.1% with 2 (patients were limited in activities) or greater. This was a key difference from the SELECT trial which did not include those with a performance status of 2 or greater, Locati noted. Other differences from the SELECT trial included specific criteria for RAI-refractory status, disease progression evidence and prior treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, the researchers noted.

The study included patients from Canada (16.9%), France (16.3%), Germany (16.6%), Italy (17.8%), Spain (17.5%) and the United Kingdom (14.8%). Data was provided by 91 clinicians who are either medical or clinical oncologists (71.4%) or endocrine oncologists (22%).

“We recognize some limitations of this study: the lack of complete safety data, short follow-up period and real-world variation in clinical outcomes,” Locati concluded.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Recent Videos
Image of a man with white hair and a white goatee.
Image of a doctor with dark curly hair and rectangular glasses.
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Experts on DTC
Related Content