News

Video

Discussing Radiation as a Treatment Option for Kidney Cancer

Fact checked by:

Key Takeaways

  • Radiation therapy is a non-invasive local treatment for renal cell carcinoma, offering symptom management and disease control.
  • It requires no anesthesia or sedation and can be completed relatively quickly, typically within one to two weeks.
SHOW MORE

An expert explained the advantages and disadvantages of radiation as a treatment for patients with renal cell carcinoma, a type of kidney cancer.

Discussions with the care team around radiation as a treatment option for patients with renal cell carcinoma, a type of kidney cancer, should focus on its advantages and disadvantages, in addition to how these can best meet patient needs, an expert said.

Renal cell carcinoma, according to the National Cancer Institute, is the most common type of kidney cancer in adults. The disease starts in the lining of the small tubes in the kidney that return filtered substances back to the blood that the body needs.

Glossary

Local therapy: treatment is directed to a limited area or specific organ within the body.

Interventional radiology: a minimally invasive procedure using imaging to guide where treatment should be targeted to destroy cancer cells.

Ablation: destruction or removal of tissue or its function that can be performed with heat or other methods.

Radiation for renal cell carcinoma can be used to manage symptoms and control disease in a minimally invasive manner.

CURE ®spoke with Dr. Chad Tang, associate professor in the Department of Radiation Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, to learn more about radiation therapy as a treatment option for patients with renal cell carcinoma.

Transcript:

So I think — radiation is a local therapy. It takes care of an anatomical site in terms of controlling it or removing the disease. I think the other local therapy options out there are surgery and IR-based interventions, interventional radiology-based interventions, such as ablation through heat or through cold.

The advantage of radiation is that it's non-invasive. It requires no anesthesia or even sedation for most patients to treat. And it can be relatively quick, although it might take a week or two for the radiation to be completed.

One disadvantage is that you're not going to give tissue-like surgery, and maybe the effects of radiation may not be as immediate in terms of relieving symptoms as physically removing the tumor.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Related Videos
Dr. Michael Bogenschutz
Photo credit: Max Mumby/Indigo via Getty Images
Dr. Maxwell Lloyd, a Clinical Fellow in Medicine, in the Department of Medicine, at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston.
Dr. Stephanie Alice Baker
Dr. Aditya Bardia is a professor in the Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, director of Translational Research Integration, and a member Signal Transduction and Therapeutics, at University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Health Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Dr. Laura Dawson, a professor and chair of the department of Radiation Oncology at the University of Toronto, and a practicing radiation oncologist in the Radiation Medicine Program at Princess Margaret Cancer Center, University Health Network in Toronto.
Dr. Sattva S. Neelapu, a professor and deputy department chair in the Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston, as well as a member of Graduate Faculty, Immunology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, at The University of Texas Health Science Center, also located in Houston.
Dr. Michael Bogenschutz, director of the NYU Langone Center for Psychedelic Medicine in New York,
Dr. Richard “Rick" Winneker
Related Content