Publication

Article

CURE

Summer 2008
Volume7
Issue 2

Timeline: The Path to Expanding Research

Drug development in childhood cancer has picked up the pace in recent years.

1948-2003

Federal regulators approve 120 new therapies for cancer; only 15 of these have pediatric information on the labeling.

1998

Officials at the Food and Drug Administration establish the “pediatric rule,” dictating that new drugs with potential for pediatric benefit must be tested in children.

2000

Four childhood cancer research groups—Children’s Cancer Group, Pediatric Oncology Group, National Wilms’ Tumor Study Group, and Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group—merge to create the Children’s Oncology Group. Today, the organization includes more than 5,000 members at more than 200 children’s hospitals, university hospitals, and cancer centers in North America.

2001

Congress passes the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act, offering companies six extra months of exclusive sales if they seek pediatric labeling. (The bill is signed into law by President Bush on January 4, 2002.)

2002

The FDA's pediatric rule is declared invalid on the grounds that the agency overstepped its authority.

2003

The Pediatric Research Equity Act, allowing the FDA to mandate pediatric drug studies, becomes law. However, the law does not include a provision for orphan diseases, which limits its application in pediatric cancer drugs.

2004

Clolar becomes the first pediatric drug in two decades to be approved for a childhood cancer without a corresponding medication for adults.

2005

The Institute of Medicine and National Research Council issue the report, “Making Better Drugs for Children with Cancer.” Among the recommendations for getting better treatment: “neither industry nor government can be expected to play this role alone.”

2007

Congress reauthorizes both the Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act and the Pediatric Research Equity Act.

2008

The Caroline Pryce Walker Conquer Childhood Cancer Act of 2008, a bill that earmarks $150 million over five years for research into childhood cancers, passed the House in June and awaits a full Senate vote this summer.

Related Videos
Dr. Guru Sonpavde emphasized the importance of better understanding how genetic mutations influence the treatment of cancer care, particularly GU cancers.
Dr. Frederick L. Locke sat down with CURE® to discuss treatment with cema-cel in the ALPHA/ALPHA2 studies for relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma.
Treatment with cemacabtagene ansegedleucel demonstrated responses in patients with relapsed or treatment-resistant large B-cell lymphoma.
Image of doctor with brown hair.
Image of man with black hair.
.Dr. Catherine Wu, chief of the Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and institute member at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, in Boston
Dr. Katy Beckermann discusses how a Fotivda and Opdivo combination for renal cell carcinoma compared with Fotivda alone based on patient feedback.
Dr. Catherine Wu is chief of the Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and institute member at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, in Boston, Massachusetts.
Dr. Alan Tan is the GU Oncology Lead at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tennessee, as well as an associate professor in the Division of Hematology/Oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and GU Executive Officer with the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology.
Dr. Sattva S. Neelapu is a professor and deputy department chair in the Department of Lymphoma/Myeloma, Division of Cancer Medicine, at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, in Houston, as well as a member of Graduate Faculty, Immunology Program, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, at The University of Texas Health Science Center, also located in Houston.
Related Content