Article

Phase 3 Cabometyx Study in Patients with Kidney Cancer Fails to Meet Goal

Author(s):

Cabometyx plus Tecentriq failed to improve progression-free survival in patients with kidney cancer.

The phase 3 CONTACT-03 study evaluating Cabometyx (cabozantinib) plus Tecentriq (atezolizumab) in patients with locally advanced or metastatic clear cell or non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma, types of kidney cancer, did not meet its primary endpoint, according to a press release from Elixis, the drugs manufacturer.

In particular, the primary endpoint was progression-free survival, or time during and after treatment when the patient lives without disease progression.

The trial included 522 patients with kidney cancer who progressed during or after immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Patients were randomized to receive either their experimental combination of Cabometyx and Tecentriq or Cabometyx alone. Secondary endpoints of the trial included objective response rate (the rate of a measurable response to the treatment) and duration of response (the time the disease responds to a treatment without growth or spread).

“There is limited data available to suggest the optimal treatment for these patients and CONTACT-03 was initiated in the hope of defining the clinical benefit of the combination of a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor and an immune checkpoint inhibitor following progression,” the release reported.

Of note, the safety profile of the experimental combination was consistent with what has previously been reported on the single agent, and no new signals were observed.

Further detailed findings will be reported at an upcoming medical meeting.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Related Videos
CURE spoke with Dr. William C. Huang about what kind of team may be required to treat a patient with metastatic kidney cancer.
Image of man wearing baseball cap backwards.
Dr. Emre Yekedüz highlighted strategies that may improve patients' quality of life and mitigate treatment-related side effects in renal cell carcinoma.
Dr. Guru Sonpavde emphasized the importance of better understanding how genetic mutations influence the treatment of cancer care, particularly GU cancers.
Image of doctor with brown hair.
Image of man with black hair.
.Dr. Catherine Wu, chief of the Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and institute member at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, in Boston
Dr. Katy Beckermann discusses how a Fotivda and Opdivo combination for renal cell carcinoma compared with Fotivda alone based on patient feedback.
Dr. Catherine Wu is chief of the Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and institute member at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, in Boston, Massachusetts.
Dr. Alan Tan is the GU Oncology Lead at the Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center in Nashville, Tennessee, as well as an associate professor in the Division of Hematology/Oncology at Vanderbilt University Medical Center and GU Executive Officer with the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology.
Related Content