Article

Keytruda Granted Priority Review for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Author(s):

Keytruda (pembrolizumab) was granted a priority review to a supplemental biologics license application for the treatment of patients with recurrent or advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have undergone at least two courses of chemotherapy.

Keytruda (pembrolizumab) was granted a priority review to a supplemental biologics license application for the treatment of patients with recurrent or advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who have undergone at least two courses of chemotherapy.

The agency is expected to announce a decision by Sept. 22, 2017.

“An estimated 100,000 people are living with gastric cancer in the United States, yet little progress has been made in bringing forward new treatment options to these patients for whom chemotherapy has long been the standard of care,” Roger Dansey, M.D., senior vice president and therapeutic area head of oncology late-stage development at Merck Research Laboratories, said in a release. Merck manufactures the PD-1 inhibitor. “We look forward to working with the FDA to bring Keytruda to people with gastric cancer who have progressed after receiving chemotherapy and are in urgent need of another option.”

The application is based on data from cohort one of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-059 trial, a multicohort, international study. Researchers are slated to present the findings, including further safety data, at the 2017 ASCO Annual Meeting in June.

In KEYNOTE-059, adult patients (259 patients) with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer who had progressed on at least two prior lines of chemotherapy were assigned to 200 mg of Keytruda every three weeks for up to two years, or until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Just over half of patients (51.7 percent) received treatment as third-line therapy and 48.3 percent received Keytruda in the fourth line.

At a median follow-up was 5.4 months, objective response rate (ORR) was 11.2 percent. More specifically, 1.9 percent of patients had a complete response, 9.3 percent had a partial response, 17 percent, had stable disease, and 55.6 percent experienced disease progression. Median duration of response was 8.1 months.

In PD-L1—positive patients, the ORR was 15.5 percent, two percent of patients had a complete response and 13.5 percent had a partial response. The ORR was 5.5 percent in PD-L1–negative patients; 1.8 percent had a complete response and 3.7 percent had a partial response.

ORR for patients receiving third-line therapy was 14.9 percent versus 7.2 percent in patients receiving treatment in the fourth line. In third-line patients with PD-L1—expressing tumors, ORR was 21.3 percent, with 4.0 percent achieving a complete response. In third-line patients with PD-L1–negative tumors, ORR was 6.9 percent with a 3.4 percent complete response.

Namrata Vijayvergia, M.D., assistant chief of gastrointestinal oncology at Fox Chase Cancer Center, reviewed the data. She said that, at present, there is little evidence supporting any therapy for patients in third- or fourth-line therapy.

“After [second line], it’s basically dealer’s choice,” she said. “There’s nothing that’s been proven to be very effective so far. The new pembrolizumab monotherapy data, as well as the nivolumab single-agent study that came from Japan, tell us this is an active drug [type] in this disease, and now we have data that third-line therapy improves survival in these patients. I am excited to get this approved as soon as possible so I can use it in my patients.”

She cautioned that there is still more to learn about the drug.

“We only have phase II data, which is a single-arm study that doesn’t have comparators,” Vijayvergia said. “I would like to see a study where it is compared to best supportive care or something like that to confirm what we see, and prove that there is a survival advantage.”

Researchers are also scheduled to present results from KEYNOTE-059 cohort 2 as a poster at ASCO 2017.Twenty-five patients with treatment-naïve HER2-positive recurrent or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were assigned to 200 mg of Keytruda on day one of each 21-day cycle, along with 80 mg/m2 of cisplatin for six cycles and 800 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil (or 1000 mg/m2 of capecitabine in Japan) every three weeks for up to two years, or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

Median follow-up was 12.2 months.

At the October 19, 2016, data cutoff, 84 percent of patients had discontinued treatment, most due to disease progression. Researchers observed grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (AEs) in 76 percent of patients. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in three patients: one grade 3 stomatitis, one grade 2 hypoacusis and one grade 1 creatinine increase. No treatment-related AEs were fatal.

Median progression-free survival was 6.6 months and median overall survival was 13.8 months.

ORR was 60 percent. Overall, 32 percent of patients had stable disease, 4 percent had progressive disease, and 4 percent were not evaluable.

In PD-L1—expressing patients, ORR was 68.8 percent versus 37.5 percent in PD-L1–negative patients. Median duration of response was 4.6 months overall, 4.6 months in PD-L1–positive patients, and 5.4 months in PD-L1–negative patients.

Researchers proceeded to KEYNOTE-059 following the phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 study. In that international trial, patients (39 patients) with PD-L1—positive recurrent or metastatic adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction received IV Keytruda at 10 mg/kg once every two weeks for 24 months or until discontinuation.

Eight of 36 patients (22 percent) had measurable responses to treatment, all partial.

All 39 patients were included in the safety analyses. Five patients (13 percent) had a total of 6 grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs: two incidents of grade 3 fatigue; one case each of grade 3 pemphigoid, hypothyroidism and peripheral sensory neuropathy; and a single incidence of grade 4 pneumonitis.

Related Videos
Dr. Kim in an interview with CURE
Dr. Barzi in an interview with CURE
nurse practitoner, Stephanie Yates
Nurse practitioner, Stephanie Yates, in an interview with CURE
Related Content