News

Video

Improving Efficacy, Minimizing Toxicity in Chemotherapy For Breast Cancer

Author(s):

Fact checked by:

An expert spoke with CURE about providers’ “two-fold goal” when using chemotherapy to treat patients with breast cancer.

When using chemotherapy to treat patients with cancer, particularly in the early curative setting, care teams are tasked with finding a treatment regimen that is beneficial while minimizing toxicity experienced by patients, Dr. Azka Ali explained in an interview with CURE®.

At the 2024 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, CURE® spoke with Ali, a medical oncologist at the Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, in Ohio, about the phase 3 S0221 clinical trial comparing different regimens of combination chemotherapy among patients with stage 1, 2 or 3 breast cancer. Ali also discussed the important role that patients play in the treatment selection process.

Transcript:

When we are treating patients with chemotherapy, especially in the early curable setting, we have a two-fold goal: One is to improve efficacy, to give treatment that's going to be the most effective for our patients and is going to cut down the risk of recurrence; the second is toxicity. How can we deliver chemotherapy that is going to be beneficial, but by minimizing toxicity? One rationale for studying the weekly dose of Adriamycin (doxorubicin) with daily oral cyclophosphamide, which was studied in S0221, was to see [two things]. Can we improve efficacy by giving chemotherapy a lot more frequently, and can we also improve toxicity at the same time? Sometimes, giving chemotherapy at a low dose at a more frequent schedule has been shown to be a little better. In terms of what was asked, both of those goals were in mind when the trial was being designed, and I would say, the goal is to optimize efficacy and minimize toxicity.

Patients play a huge role in the treatment selection. As oncologists, our job, my job, is to guide them through the best treatment available. If we have treatment options where there's equipoise about what's the better treatment, then I leave it up to my patients. If patients live [farther] away, I try to do treatments that are not [given] as frequent as weekly. If patients live close but they're older, or if they prefer to take the treatment that's going to probably give them the least amount of toxicity, then I do advocate for more frequent treatments, like weekly regimens.

Transcript has been edited for clarity and conciseness.

For more news on cancer updates, research and education, don’t forget to subscribe to CURE®’s newsletters here.

Related Videos
Image of Dr. Fakih.
.Dr. Catherine Wu, chief of the Division of Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapies at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and institute member at the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, in Boston
Image of Doctor with blonde hair.
Dr. Katy Beckermann discusses how a Fotivda and Opdivo combination for renal cell carcinoma compared with Fotivda alone based on patient feedback.
Dr. Petros Grivas discusses what precautions should be considered when treating patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who have diabetes.
Dr. Debu Tripathy discussed the importance of understanding the distinctions between HER2-low and HER2-ultralow breast cancer.
Primary urothelial cancer has variable histologies, making its treatment complex, leading to varied outcomes with high rates of recurrence in patients.
Dr. Neeraj Agarwal is a medical oncologist, a professor of medicine and the Presidential Endowed Chair of Cancer Research at the Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, as well as director of the Genitourinary Oncology Program and the Center of Investigational Therapeutics at the Huntsman Cancer Institute in Salt Lake City.
Image of Dr. Goy.
Image of bald man.