Article

Biomarker Tests

Author(s):

Biomarker tests must strike a balance between sensitivity and specificity.

Screening tests confirm or disprove a healthcare provider’s suspicion that a patient has cancer so that a medical decision can then be made. But in order for a test to be considered useful, it must be able to correctly distinguish between a person who has the disease and a person who does not. Ideally, a test would be 100 percent accurate; however, while tests in the clinic are usually quite accurate, there are still some errors to account for. The following measures help determine a test’s usefulness:

Accuracy is the likelihood that a positive test result indicates disease or that a negative test result excludes disease. The accuracy of a test is determined by how sensitive and specific it is.

Sensitivity measures the percentage of people with cancer correctly identified as having cancer. If a biomarker test is not sensitive enough, the results may suggest a person does not have cancer when in fact he or she does. This is called a “false negative.” If a test is highly sensitive, it will identify most people with the disease—that is, it will result in few false-negative results.

Specificity measures the percentage of people who do not have cancer correctly identified as being free of disease. If a biomarker test is not specific enough, the results may suggest a person has cancer when in fact he or she does not. This is called a “false positive.” If a test is highly specific, only a small number of people will test positive for the disease who do not have it—in other words, it will result in few false-positive results.

Positive Predictive Value is the percentage of patients who test positive for a disease who actually have the disease.

Negative Predictive Value is the percentage of patients who test negative for a disease who do not actually have the disease.

[Read how biomarkers are changing the face of cancer screening and diagnosis.]

Newsletter

Stay up to date on cancer updates, research and education

Related Videos
Daniel Jernazian, who beat cancer twice, credits his sports mindset for survival and calls it winning his ‘life World Championship’.
Patients in rural or underserved areas may have worse outcomes, highlighting the need for early support to address care access barriers.
Image of man with text.
Image of doctor with text.
Dr. Emre Yekedüz discusses how ASCO 2025 highlights precision medicine, biomarkers and the gut microbiome as keys to advancing kidney cancer care.
Dr. Breelyn Wilky stresses the importance of expert guidance and second opinions for patients with GIST, as treatment options continue to evolve rapidly.
Mark Daniels, 83, credits CAR T-cell therapy and compassionate care for helping him overcome lymphoma and endure the isolating treatment toll.
An early study of BGB-16673 for hard-to-treat leukemia found that side effects were manageable with no new safety concerns.
Image of woman with text.
Image of goy, and text.
Related Content