|
Finding It Early
. . . . .
Your article on early
detection of lung cancer in the Fall issue is just so true.
Fourteen years ago, my husband had a pre-op chest X-ray prior to
foot surgery. Then the phone call came telling us there was a shadow
on his lung. He survived 14 years after that first diagnosis. According
to the doctor, if he had waited for symptoms, it would have been
too late and he would have died much sooner. Even though I lost
my husband last year, I still read CURE cover to cover because I
always find something in it that I can relate to.
Janet L. Berg
Lombard, Ill.
Debating Special Report
. . . . .
I found the article “Medical Marijuana Use in Oncology”
(Special
Report, Fall 2005) to be unfair and misleading to cancer patients
and their families. The article does, in fact, begin by reporting
that an overwhelming 70 percent majority of oncologists surveyed
do NOT support the legalization of marijuana for medical use. However,
the main focus of the article quickly shifts to the opinions of
one oncologist and one researcher, both of whom support the concept
of so-called “medical marijuana.” Although these two
individuals clearly represent a minority viewpoint, the article
consistently states that any opposition to marijuana legalization
is the result of “political and social baggage.” This
type of biased reporting is typical for newspapers, but alarming
to read in a generally serious medical publication such as CURE.
According to the National Cancer Institute,
inhaling marijuana smoke for any purpose is a health hazard,
because it contains
over 400 potential carcinogens.
In fact, smoking marijuana delivers up to five times the amount of tars and
carbon monoxide as tobacco cigarettes into the body, causing severe
lung damage, which
is not helpful to someone suffering from cancer.
Marijuana is an intoxicant;
therefore it is not surprising that sincere people will report
relief of their symptoms when they smoke it. Heroin also makes people
feel better, but no one would suggest using heroin to treat a sick person.
There
are effective methods of relief that are not dangerous to the patient.
James
J. Halushka
Deputy Prosecutor
Oakland County Prosecutor’s Office
Pontiac, Mich.
. . . . .
“Stock Tips from Cancer Patients” (Special
Report, Summer 2005) contains the hint of a draconian solution
to a negligible problem. As your article points out, investors cannot
gain a meaningful advantage by eavesdropping on online dialogues
between patients, as such trades would be foolishly based on a very
partial record of the trial. However, making people sign oaths of
confidentiality to enter trials would significantly harm patients.
After being diagnosed with a currently incurable form of non-Hodgkin’s
lymphoma, my doctors gave me a choice between watch and wait and
a clinical trial. Only by comparing situations with other patients
who had faced the same decision was I able to come to grips with
making this choice. Had all of the patients who entered the trials
been barred from participating in these discussions, I would have
been left adrift and forced to make a far less informed choice.
Andrew Michael
Half Moon Bay, Calif.
Newly Diagnosed
. . . . .
I received my first issue of CURE today. I can tell this will be
one of the most-read magazines for my family. For me at this time,
the mental aspects of having cancer are more difficult than the
physical. I am 39 and found out four months ago that I have multiple
myeloma. I am married and have a 6-year-old daughter. One of the
hardest things to do is to be strong for my daughter. Your magazine
will be a part of my “total treatment.”
Randy Trotter
Manning, S.C.
We
love to hear what you thought about the stories in CURE. And don’t
forget that we are always looking for good writing from our readers.
Send your stories about cancer and its impact on your life to mweber@curetoday.com.
Keep it to 1,000 words please.
Address your comments and letters to editor@curetoday.com.
Letters are published at the editor's discretion and may be edited
for length. If you prefer your letter not be published, please indicate.
|